Need an argumentative essay on CREEP Literature Review 3. Needs to be 4 pages. Please no plagiarism.
In addition, this protocol applies to all special procedure units where aspirations, biopsies, or visualization through scopes may be performed.
In 1997, the writer personally experienced an incident that took place in an operating theatre at a local hospital. Fortunately, a wrong site surgery on the patient was avoided on the last minute,
hence leaving the patient unharmed and safe. According to this experience and to the writer, responsibility is an important part of being a member of the operating theatre management team. the writer in this literature review will essentially try to cover the most important elements and researches for wrong site surgery to answer the research question “What are the potential solutions to prevent wrong site surgery?”
The search strategy used the following sources – MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, BNET, PubMed, OVID and ScienceDirect. additionally, primary sources such as AORN, Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing and Journal of American College of Surgeons were also used throughout research. Search terms used were ‘Surgical errors’, ‘Site Surgery’, ‘Surgical site’, ‘Wrong site surgery’, ‘Wrong procedure’, ‘Wrong person surgery’, ‘Communication failures in the Operating Room’. There was no location restriction in this literature review. All entries were in the English language or with abstracts in English that were viewed because of the paucity of ‘clinical trials’ or ‘systematic reviews’. These searches were made between 2000 and 2008.
Due to the depth of this important topic a total of (the number will be add later) articles were only identified using the above sources and eight articles were chosen from those that were reviewed. The majority of the research conducted was done in the United States.
Five major themes were identified in the literature review: definitions of wrong site surgery, the